There was one quote in paritcular in this reading by Ralph Waldo Emerson, that I really enjoyed.
"Instead of feeling a poverty when we encounter a great man, let us treat the new comer like a traveling geologist who passes through our estate and shows us good slate, or limestone, or anthracite, in our brush pasture."
What I understood from this statement, was that we shouldn't focus on our inadequacy especially by comparing ourselves to others that may appear more sucessful. Instead we should open our eyes to any lesson that can be learned from what that individual in beholding in their soul. The appearance of success is what may attract us to be interested in someone, but we should always pay more attention to a persons kindness, honesty, and all things that are deeper than only surface appearance.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein states:
"Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison [the illusion of ourselves being separate from the universe] by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living beings and all of nature".
Wow! What a beautiful statement from Einstein, and I couldn't agree more. For some reason we all get so consumed with our own lives. Our own happiness, and suffering can cause us to live in this type of "prison" that Einstein is describing. The prison that causes us to forget about others around us, and to show compassion for every living being. If only we could widen our nurturing to everything we come in contact everyday, it could potenially make such an impact to those around us.
"Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison [the illusion of ourselves being separate from the universe] by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living beings and all of nature".
Wow! What a beautiful statement from Einstein, and I couldn't agree more. For some reason we all get so consumed with our own lives. Our own happiness, and suffering can cause us to live in this type of "prison" that Einstein is describing. The prison that causes us to forget about others around us, and to show compassion for every living being. If only we could widen our nurturing to everything we come in contact everyday, it could potenially make such an impact to those around us.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Abu Abdallah Al-Harith Al-Muhasibi
This passage states:
"The love of God in its essence is the illumination of the heart by joy because of its nearness to the Beloved, for love, in solitude rises up triumphant, and the heart of the love is possessed by the sense of its fellowship with him, and when solitude is combined with the secret intercourse of the Beloved, the joy of that intercourse overwhelms the mind, so that it is no longer concerned with this world and what is in it."
In my opinion this statement seemed similar to the enlightenment that Buddhists speak of. I realize the overall concept is different because Buddhists are not surrendering to one God in particular, but the similarity is that there is a supposed level that a person can reach where the physical world is not really of much importance.
The passage continues on describing how a person who follows God should be so devoted that they are constantly serving Him with every breath and action. And, that these "lovers of God" should be living only to prove that they are acceptable servants for God.
Once again, this passage really didn't "hit home" for me in any way. It was well-written, but certainly not a belief system that I could adopt.
"The love of God in its essence is the illumination of the heart by joy because of its nearness to the Beloved, for love, in solitude rises up triumphant, and the heart of the love is possessed by the sense of its fellowship with him, and when solitude is combined with the secret intercourse of the Beloved, the joy of that intercourse overwhelms the mind, so that it is no longer concerned with this world and what is in it."
In my opinion this statement seemed similar to the enlightenment that Buddhists speak of. I realize the overall concept is different because Buddhists are not surrendering to one God in particular, but the similarity is that there is a supposed level that a person can reach where the physical world is not really of much importance.
The passage continues on describing how a person who follows God should be so devoted that they are constantly serving Him with every breath and action. And, that these "lovers of God" should be living only to prove that they are acceptable servants for God.
Once again, this passage really didn't "hit home" for me in any way. It was well-written, but certainly not a belief system that I could adopt.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Muhammad
This passage from Muhammad was interesting to read. Specifically it was interesting how Muhammad has capitalized the word "We" in the beginning of this passage. I suppose by capitalizing we, Muhammad is speaking of the people that have grasped the concept of Islam?
From what I could gather, Muhammad is expressing to us that once a person has fully surrendered to God, he will not only have a relationship with God, but that God will be inside the person who has reached Islam. I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly, but this is what I have understood.
Still, I did get a sense of fear when reading this. Muhammad states, "He is with you wherever you are...He is aware of all you do. Muhammad is trying to instill a sense of fear for the reader in my opinion. A short sentence to remind followers to be very careful of all their actions, because they are always being viewed and judged by God.
Overall this passage didn't seem too different than something I would read in regards to the Christianity. It didn't really do anything for me spiritually, but it wasn't terrible to read.
From what I could gather, Muhammad is expressing to us that once a person has fully surrendered to God, he will not only have a relationship with God, but that God will be inside the person who has reached Islam. I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly, but this is what I have understood.
Still, I did get a sense of fear when reading this. Muhammad states, "He is with you wherever you are...He is aware of all you do. Muhammad is trying to instill a sense of fear for the reader in my opinion. A short sentence to remind followers to be very careful of all their actions, because they are always being viewed and judged by God.
Overall this passage didn't seem too different than something I would read in regards to the Christianity. It didn't really do anything for me spiritually, but it wasn't terrible to read.
Friday, October 10, 2008
John the Evangelist
This passage from John the Evangelist states:
" Love comes from God, and everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God".
In my opinion love is very important. Love is what makes most of us feel whole and fulfilled. Weather it's a deep love for someone, or something like a passion or hobby. But I personally have a difficult time believing that those who choose to follow in the beliefs (specifically Christianity)that this passage is referencing are truly filled with nondiscriminatory love. One thing that comes to mind in particular, is this question:
How can a religion such as Christianity, that has this underlying message of love decide not to love a person based purely on his or her sexual orientation, or personal choices that an individual is entitled to make for him/herself? That doesn't seem very loving to me.
" Love comes from God, and everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God".
In my opinion love is very important. Love is what makes most of us feel whole and fulfilled. Weather it's a deep love for someone, or something like a passion or hobby. But I personally have a difficult time believing that those who choose to follow in the beliefs (specifically Christianity)that this passage is referencing are truly filled with nondiscriminatory love. One thing that comes to mind in particular, is this question:
How can a religion such as Christianity, that has this underlying message of love decide not to love a person based purely on his or her sexual orientation, or personal choices that an individual is entitled to make for him/herself? That doesn't seem very loving to me.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Jesus of Nazareth
My, my my...where to begin? Whew...here it goes.
Jesus of Nazareth states:
"Isn't your life more than its food, and your body more than its clothing?" Overall, I like this statement. And, yes I agree modern society certainly places far too much emphasis on material items. I live in Roseville, where myself and all my neighbors are surrounded by; mega-this and mega-that. Mega-stores, mega-malls, mega-cars, mega...mega..mega. I am guilty of seeking the material things as well. I buy nice clothes for my daughter, my house is furnished with beautiful things, I could go on and on. I do enjoy certain material things that life has to offer.
I don't live beyond my means though, and in my opinion there are far too many people that are completely consumed with material things...they allow it to define who they are both physically and spiritually.
Now onto my point in all this. If the message Jesus is trying to say is that: We should not give these material things much value at all. We should live simply with only what we need to survive, and be humble...how is it even possible that people of these faiths that follow Jesus' teachings are even capable of throwing up the multi-million dollar mega-churches? I mean honestly! I highly doubt that Jesus of Nazareth the "minimalist" would have been pleased to see hundreds of people flooding into churches built on prime real estate, serving Starbucks coffee, and using church funds to pay the minister a six-figure salary to live in a 5000 square foot home in Granite Bay.
Personally I think Jesus envisioned his followers congregating in a beautiful pasture beneath the sky, so his followers would be able to see the "...birds of the sky: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns..."
Jesus of Nazareth states:
"Isn't your life more than its food, and your body more than its clothing?" Overall, I like this statement. And, yes I agree modern society certainly places far too much emphasis on material items. I live in Roseville, where myself and all my neighbors are surrounded by; mega-this and mega-that. Mega-stores, mega-malls, mega-cars, mega...mega..mega. I am guilty of seeking the material things as well. I buy nice clothes for my daughter, my house is furnished with beautiful things, I could go on and on. I do enjoy certain material things that life has to offer.
I don't live beyond my means though, and in my opinion there are far too many people that are completely consumed with material things...they allow it to define who they are both physically and spiritually.
Now onto my point in all this. If the message Jesus is trying to say is that: We should not give these material things much value at all. We should live simply with only what we need to survive, and be humble...how is it even possible that people of these faiths that follow Jesus' teachings are even capable of throwing up the multi-million dollar mega-churches? I mean honestly! I highly doubt that Jesus of Nazareth the "minimalist" would have been pleased to see hundreds of people flooding into churches built on prime real estate, serving Starbucks coffee, and using church funds to pay the minister a six-figure salary to live in a 5000 square foot home in Granite Bay.
Personally I think Jesus envisioned his followers congregating in a beautiful pasture beneath the sky, so his followers would be able to see the "...birds of the sky: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns..."
Friday, October 3, 2008
Dogen
Dogen states: "Gaining enlightenment is like the moon reflected on the water. The moon doesn't get wet; the water isn't broken...the whole moon and the whole sky are reflected in one dewdrop on the grass...enlightenment doesn't destroy the person, just as the moon doesn't break the water."
The more I am learning about Buddhist philosophy, the more I am beginning to believe that this all makes such complete sense to me. In some of my previous blogs, I have questioned the possibility of our ability to become truly enlightened. I have felt that our human bodies are meant to absorb the environment around us. And, that we shouldn't attempt to ignore our own inherent senses in order to reach a sense of peace. But, I really enjoyed this passage from Dogen. It seems to say that we can still be human and enjoy our surroundings with each of our senses, and reach a state of peacefulness at the same time. I love this idea of accepting what is in our present and being content with that.
When I reached the point in the passage where meditation is discussed I realized something interesting. Since the beginning of this class, and the first time meditation was discussed in our class, I have held skepticism about it. I was feeling like meditation was a great idea, but asked myself, "who could really actively practice this in modern society?". We are flooded with stimulation all day. Television, traffic, phone calls, radio...we are constantly being bombarded with activity around us. Then a light bulb turned on for me. I am completely capable of meditation, and I have proof to myself that I can meditate.
Seven years ago when I was in labor with my daughter, I decided I was going to give her a "natural birth". I refused all medication, and the entire time I was laboring with her, I was totally meditating. Not only have I done this before...but I was really good at it! I blocked out every thought in my mind for hours upon hours. I remember that I didn't even feel like I was within my own body. It was as if I completely detached myself from the physical pain. My thoughts were of nothing, and I didn't allow anything negative or positive to enter my consciousness. After my little one was born, my mom said how peaceful I appeared throughout the entire labor. She said it looked like I was just sleeping. I can't believe I never considered that experience as being meditation. I think now I am going to attempt to bring myself back there at times. What an incredible way to escape for awhile.
The more I am learning about Buddhist philosophy, the more I am beginning to believe that this all makes such complete sense to me. In some of my previous blogs, I have questioned the possibility of our ability to become truly enlightened. I have felt that our human bodies are meant to absorb the environment around us. And, that we shouldn't attempt to ignore our own inherent senses in order to reach a sense of peace. But, I really enjoyed this passage from Dogen. It seems to say that we can still be human and enjoy our surroundings with each of our senses, and reach a state of peacefulness at the same time. I love this idea of accepting what is in our present and being content with that.
When I reached the point in the passage where meditation is discussed I realized something interesting. Since the beginning of this class, and the first time meditation was discussed in our class, I have held skepticism about it. I was feeling like meditation was a great idea, but asked myself, "who could really actively practice this in modern society?". We are flooded with stimulation all day. Television, traffic, phone calls, radio...we are constantly being bombarded with activity around us. Then a light bulb turned on for me. I am completely capable of meditation, and I have proof to myself that I can meditate.
Seven years ago when I was in labor with my daughter, I decided I was going to give her a "natural birth". I refused all medication, and the entire time I was laboring with her, I was totally meditating. Not only have I done this before...but I was really good at it! I blocked out every thought in my mind for hours upon hours. I remember that I didn't even feel like I was within my own body. It was as if I completely detached myself from the physical pain. My thoughts were of nothing, and I didn't allow anything negative or positive to enter my consciousness. After my little one was born, my mom said how peaceful I appeared throughout the entire labor. She said it looked like I was just sleeping. I can't believe I never considered that experience as being meditation. I think now I am going to attempt to bring myself back there at times. What an incredible way to escape for awhile.
The Buddha
This was beautiful to read. In the past couple weeks, my life has taken a turn. At first I felt this change was negative. I have spent a great deal of time wishing things could be different, and more what I had imagined. Reading these selections from Buddha have given a sense of inner peace. It's funny how that works sometimes...just a short piece of reading has provided immense comfort for me now. For me, the most significant statement from this reading was, "all truths should be used to cross over; they should not be held on to once you have arrived." This made such clear sense to me, because it seems so very true. What I will take from reading this is this: Sometimes we are made aware of a truth that is painful to our soul. Instead of dwelling on the betrayal and heartache, we must use the truth to enable us to "cross over" onto the next portion of our lives, and leave the hurt behind. I have printed out the quote mentioned above, and put it on my refrigerator. I want to remember this always. It know it will help me a great deal in the future, and help me to be thankful that I am learning and growing every moment of this life.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Tu-Shun
This was a tricky passage for me to fully grasp. I'll do my best to explain what I understood from the reading in hopes that I have not missed anything significant.
The passage seems to explain a detailed metaphor for the relationship of all human interaction. In the beginning of the passage it seemed as though the metaphor was explaining how our connections with each other are similar to a net-like organization of jewels. I thought the metaphor would be used to make a point that our own individual actions are reflected upon others in the same way a jewel would reflect light to surrounding jewels. But in reading further, it became clear that the metaphor was describing God's interactions with all of mankind, and how mankind (as the many jewels) are then reflecting God's message (one jewel) to others.
I agree that our actions in life both positive and negative, certainly are reflected unto others. Here are some examples I have noticed. If we choose to wear stress, anger and hardship on our bodies, usually others can sense it. And, the negativity is potentially spread around to those around us. If we are warm, nurturing and kind, I think that can change a "jewel" around us as well. I don't think that our actions need to be viewed as coming from God though.
Take God out of this metaphor and I would love it!
The passage seems to explain a detailed metaphor for the relationship of all human interaction. In the beginning of the passage it seemed as though the metaphor was explaining how our connections with each other are similar to a net-like organization of jewels. I thought the metaphor would be used to make a point that our own individual actions are reflected upon others in the same way a jewel would reflect light to surrounding jewels. But in reading further, it became clear that the metaphor was describing God's interactions with all of mankind, and how mankind (as the many jewels) are then reflecting God's message (one jewel) to others.
I agree that our actions in life both positive and negative, certainly are reflected unto others. Here are some examples I have noticed. If we choose to wear stress, anger and hardship on our bodies, usually others can sense it. And, the negativity is potentially spread around to those around us. If we are warm, nurturing and kind, I think that can change a "jewel" around us as well. I don't think that our actions need to be viewed as coming from God though.
Take God out of this metaphor and I would love it!
Tsu-ssu
After finishing this selection of passages from The Central Harmony the question that is heavy on my mind, and that I've had many discussions about is: Nature versus Nurture? Are the actions of mankind innately determined at birth? Or do the personal experiences we encounter in our lives, reflect upon the behavioral traits in which we possess?
The Central Harmony states, "What is bestowed by heaven is called human nature." What a beautiful view of our existence; the idea that we are all given the gift of human nature at birth, and that the gift of human nature is pure and untainted.
In my own life I have had some experiences that have caused me to question the integrity of man. And during these personal experiences I have thought to myself, "mankind is not good". I have entertained the idea that the majority of people are living without good intentions, and existing only to gratify themselves.
As my life moved forward and away from the troubling times, I began to once again view people in a more positive light. I was able to see the good again. I felt a deep connection to the quote stated above, because it is how I choose to look at the world now. I like to believe that our behavioral traits and the actions we take in our lives are a combination of nature and nurture. The idea that we are all born uncontaminated, and it is our life experiences that interfere with that if we choose to allow it, is for some reason very comforting to me.
The Central Harmony states, "What is bestowed by heaven is called human nature." What a beautiful view of our existence; the idea that we are all given the gift of human nature at birth, and that the gift of human nature is pure and untainted.
In my own life I have had some experiences that have caused me to question the integrity of man. And during these personal experiences I have thought to myself, "mankind is not good". I have entertained the idea that the majority of people are living without good intentions, and existing only to gratify themselves.
As my life moved forward and away from the troubling times, I began to once again view people in a more positive light. I was able to see the good again. I felt a deep connection to the quote stated above, because it is how I choose to look at the world now. I like to believe that our behavioral traits and the actions we take in our lives are a combination of nature and nurture. The idea that we are all born uncontaminated, and it is our life experiences that interfere with that if we choose to allow it, is for some reason very comforting to me.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Bakhya Ibn Pakuda
This passage from The Enlightened Mind, written by Bakhya Ibn Pakuda was very interesting to read. I read the passage twice just to make certain I didn't skip over anything significant, and I realized something funny. Both times, I read this passage with a sort of "obsessive ex-boyfriend" tone. Specifically when Pakuda states a quote from a fellow "lover of God", "if you were to burn my body in the fire, it would only increase my love for you and my joy in you". The author seems to be explaining a love for God so deep, that everything he encounters in his life will be viewed as a loving message from God Himself, no matter the circumstance. The author believes that all experiences both good and bad will be out of our physical control, and in the hands of God.
In my opinion this is a terrifying concept. The idea of my life being completely in the hands of another being such as God, is frightening! I prefer the idea that we have a life purpose, but ultimately we are in control of that.
I think sometimes when individuals believes this idea fully, it allows for an excuse when a bad decision is made. I mean hypothetically, a person could commit some horrific, violent crime and then simply claim that God has somehow sent them a message, and that by allowing them to participate in the crime, it's God will. That is scary!
In my opinion this is a terrifying concept. The idea of my life being completely in the hands of another being such as God, is frightening! I prefer the idea that we have a life purpose, but ultimately we are in control of that.
I think sometimes when individuals believes this idea fully, it allows for an excuse when a bad decision is made. I mean hypothetically, a person could commit some horrific, violent crime and then simply claim that God has somehow sent them a message, and that by allowing them to participate in the crime, it's God will. That is scary!
The Bible
I chose to read this passage in The Enlightened Mind for a very specific reason. I am highly uneducated when it comes to Bible specifics. I have somehow justified having opinions regarding certain portions of the Bible , but I suppose I should really educate myself deeper on the book so I have more knowledge to utilize in future religious discussions.
My belief of the Bible as a whole has been this; The Bible was just a book, filled with myths and stories meant to be taken as moral lessons. I have never thought The Bible was meant to be taken literally. My opinion is that the Bible is an accumulation of folk tales which have been passed down from generations in recent history. I have had an awareness of the Bible's underlying message on certain controversial topics, and I never wanted to read any part of that for fear it would anger me much too greatly. Something has changed within me though. Prior to enrolling in our World Religion class this semester, I had decided that I was ready to open myself up and truly learn. The first day of class I arrived with an open mind ready to soak up all the knowledge that would come my way. And, I have done just that. I read this passage from the Bible open-minded.
Jason has mentioned a couple times in class his opinion that when God created the world the message isn't that he created it in seven days, but, that "it was good". This passage from the Bible begins with a quote referencing that same idea. The book reads, "And God looked at everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good". I love the idea of shifting the focus from creationism versus evolution, to the good in which has been created.
My belief of the Bible as a whole has been this; The Bible was just a book, filled with myths and stories meant to be taken as moral lessons. I have never thought The Bible was meant to be taken literally. My opinion is that the Bible is an accumulation of folk tales which have been passed down from generations in recent history. I have had an awareness of the Bible's underlying message on certain controversial topics, and I never wanted to read any part of that for fear it would anger me much too greatly. Something has changed within me though. Prior to enrolling in our World Religion class this semester, I had decided that I was ready to open myself up and truly learn. The first day of class I arrived with an open mind ready to soak up all the knowledge that would come my way. And, I have done just that. I read this passage from the Bible open-minded.
Jason has mentioned a couple times in class his opinion that when God created the world the message isn't that he created it in seven days, but, that "it was good". This passage from the Bible begins with a quote referencing that same idea. The book reads, "And God looked at everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good". I love the idea of shifting the focus from creationism versus evolution, to the good in which has been created.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Shankara
Where do I begin? Well let me start by saying I enjoyed this reading. It was very interesting to me and I found myself once again (along with my previous reading) in very deep thought. The overall sense of this passage is to encourage true and pure enlightenment.
This passage is written by an Indian Yogi and Philosopher, Shankara. The reading begins with a short sentence, "this universe is nothing but Brahman". Although I thought I had a sense of what the term "Brahman" meant, I wanted to go back to our textbook to clarify. Our text states, "In the Upanishads the word Brahman was expanded to mean a divine reality at the heart of things". Now I had a better idea and was able to continue my reading. Shankara asks many questions in this reading, and I thought for this blog entry I would state several of them and then share my opinion and response to some of those questions.
Shankara explains that we as human being should achieve a place in life where our spirit is basically separated from our physical environment. Shankara states, " when a great soul has found perfect tranquility by freezing his mind from distracting thoughts and completely realizing Brahman, then he no longer needs sacred places, moral disciplines, set hours, postures, directions, or objects...". I understand the power behind having the ability to do this. The idea of not having any worry, distraction, or contamination from the physical world would most likely be ideal for everyone. But I must say, I think it's highly unrealistic for most individuals. The fact is, that we are physical beings. We live in a physical world. The anatomy and physiology of our bodies allow us to experience the world through each of our senses. We have vision to view our surroundings, we have nerve endings so we can feel and touch, and we have auditory senses to hear activity in our environment. Most importantly we have cerebral function which allows us to analyze our surroundings, and have opinions that we share with others. In order for us as human beings to completely ignore many of these senses that we have evolved with, is I'm sure highly impossible for most. The idea of walking through a crowded city street, bustling with people and not watching them, or interacting with them is difficult to imagine.
Shankara suggests that we achieve "atman" or our deepest self and states, "this Atman shines with its own light...he who knows that Atman is free from every kind of bondage." These words are beautiful to read, and I believe in the peaceful message that Shankara is speaking about. In my opinion a balance between obtaining Atman and still truly experiencing our physical world would be ideal.
This passage is written by an Indian Yogi and Philosopher, Shankara. The reading begins with a short sentence, "this universe is nothing but Brahman". Although I thought I had a sense of what the term "Brahman" meant, I wanted to go back to our textbook to clarify. Our text states, "In the Upanishads the word Brahman was expanded to mean a divine reality at the heart of things". Now I had a better idea and was able to continue my reading. Shankara asks many questions in this reading, and I thought for this blog entry I would state several of them and then share my opinion and response to some of those questions.
Shankara explains that we as human being should achieve a place in life where our spirit is basically separated from our physical environment. Shankara states, " when a great soul has found perfect tranquility by freezing his mind from distracting thoughts and completely realizing Brahman, then he no longer needs sacred places, moral disciplines, set hours, postures, directions, or objects...". I understand the power behind having the ability to do this. The idea of not having any worry, distraction, or contamination from the physical world would most likely be ideal for everyone. But I must say, I think it's highly unrealistic for most individuals. The fact is, that we are physical beings. We live in a physical world. The anatomy and physiology of our bodies allow us to experience the world through each of our senses. We have vision to view our surroundings, we have nerve endings so we can feel and touch, and we have auditory senses to hear activity in our environment. Most importantly we have cerebral function which allows us to analyze our surroundings, and have opinions that we share with others. In order for us as human beings to completely ignore many of these senses that we have evolved with, is I'm sure highly impossible for most. The idea of walking through a crowded city street, bustling with people and not watching them, or interacting with them is difficult to imagine.
Shankara suggests that we achieve "atman" or our deepest self and states, "this Atman shines with its own light...he who knows that Atman is free from every kind of bondage." These words are beautiful to read, and I believe in the peaceful message that Shankara is speaking about. In my opinion a balance between obtaining Atman and still truly experiencing our physical world would be ideal.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Raman Maharshi
Although a relatively short reading, this passage took me quite awhile to get through. Some of the phrases were very deep, and I needed to re-read them in order to fully understand the message.
One phrase I enjoyed in particular was when Maharshi speaks of love and joy. Maharshi states, "every being in the world longs to be always joyful, without any taint of sorrow", and this quote was very significant for me. I agree. Human beings do seem to long for a time when we will live in an utter state of happiness. At times of hardship in my own life, I have caught myself saying things like, "why can't I just be happy?". I have realized though, that we cannot fully experience the blissful times unless we also experience the sadness. I have fantasized my life lacking all hardship or grief, and realized that I would never truly know happiness. I wouldn't truly know happiness, because there wouldn't be any other emotion to compare the happiness to. Maharshi says, "love is caused by joy", and I like to continue that by saying, joy is caused by sadness, anger or grieving.
I also, really enjoyed portion of this passage where Maharshi responds to a question asked about teachers. The question Maharshi is asked, "what are the signs by which one can recognize a true teacher?" is answered so beautifully. Maharshi responds by stating, "[a true teacher] never sees difference between himself and others, is never moved by false ideas or distinctions." Maharshi seems to be explaining that he does not see himself as a wise teacher above anyone else. He makes it clear to us readers that he is equal with us, and his intellect is not better or more important that ours. Maharshi seems to believe that in order to be a true teacher, one cannot have an attitude that they are in some way better than the student. Maharshi simply explains that the teacher must retain, "courage and self control at all times [and remain] unshakable."
One phrase I enjoyed in particular was when Maharshi speaks of love and joy. Maharshi states, "every being in the world longs to be always joyful, without any taint of sorrow", and this quote was very significant for me. I agree. Human beings do seem to long for a time when we will live in an utter state of happiness. At times of hardship in my own life, I have caught myself saying things like, "why can't I just be happy?". I have realized though, that we cannot fully experience the blissful times unless we also experience the sadness. I have fantasized my life lacking all hardship or grief, and realized that I would never truly know happiness. I wouldn't truly know happiness, because there wouldn't be any other emotion to compare the happiness to. Maharshi says, "love is caused by joy", and I like to continue that by saying, joy is caused by sadness, anger or grieving.
I also, really enjoyed portion of this passage where Maharshi responds to a question asked about teachers. The question Maharshi is asked, "what are the signs by which one can recognize a true teacher?" is answered so beautifully. Maharshi responds by stating, "[a true teacher] never sees difference between himself and others, is never moved by false ideas or distinctions." Maharshi seems to be explaining that he does not see himself as a wise teacher above anyone else. He makes it clear to us readers that he is equal with us, and his intellect is not better or more important that ours. Maharshi seems to believe that in order to be a true teacher, one cannot have an attitude that they are in some way better than the student. Maharshi simply explains that the teacher must retain, "courage and self control at all times [and remain] unshakable."
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Response to reading by Chief Seattle
Wow! What an incredibly beautiful speech by Chief Seattle. When I sat down to read these two passages (by Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha and Chief Seattle) I truly did not anticipate how much these speeches would affect me. This last one by Chief Seattle brought tears to my eyes. I am so saddened to learn of history being so cruel to the Native American people. White man have been so unfair with their lack of compassion to these beautifully spiritual people.
When I read this speech from Chief Seattle addressing Governor Stevens, I cannot fathom how the Chief's words would not be well taken and accepted. I suppose I just didn't ever consider how brutal and forceful our history with the Native Americans really was. We basically quarantined the Native Americans to what what white man called "reservations", and never accepted their pure, untainted love for the earth. If only we could appreciate the wisdom that the Native Americans held, our earth could be a much better place. If the majority of modern Americans could respect the earth as the Native Americans clearly did, I feel we would have far less suffering today. Modern American society as a whole has grown to be glutenous and unappreciative. As a culture we are wasteful and narcissistic only caring about ourselves and forgetting to take notice in the simple beauty of our earth.
Chief Seattle also speaks of the differences with the ways of worship between his people and white man. He tells about white man's God being "an angry God", writing His religion on "tables of stone by the iron finger", so it would not be forgotten. Chief Seattle continues by explaining that the Native Americans Great Spirit would never need to do this, because their people remember their religion which has been written in the hearts of their people. Chief Seattle states that "I think my people will accept it and go to the reservation you offer them", he continues explaining "we will live apart, and in peace".
Chief Seattle then goes on to conclude that the "Indian's night's will be dark", and when there are no more children of the "great tribes" left in the wide world, their spirits will still live among the earth. He warns, "the white man will never be alone...so let him [the spirits] be just and deal kindly with my people...the dead have power too.".
It is clear Chief Seattle was very well spoken and had a way of allowing his heart to be seen with his words. I feel a sense of change within myself after reading his speech.
When I read this speech from Chief Seattle addressing Governor Stevens, I cannot fathom how the Chief's words would not be well taken and accepted. I suppose I just didn't ever consider how brutal and forceful our history with the Native Americans really was. We basically quarantined the Native Americans to what what white man called "reservations", and never accepted their pure, untainted love for the earth. If only we could appreciate the wisdom that the Native Americans held, our earth could be a much better place. If the majority of modern Americans could respect the earth as the Native Americans clearly did, I feel we would have far less suffering today. Modern American society as a whole has grown to be glutenous and unappreciative. As a culture we are wasteful and narcissistic only caring about ourselves and forgetting to take notice in the simple beauty of our earth.
Chief Seattle also speaks of the differences with the ways of worship between his people and white man. He tells about white man's God being "an angry God", writing His religion on "tables of stone by the iron finger", so it would not be forgotten. Chief Seattle continues by explaining that the Native Americans Great Spirit would never need to do this, because their people remember their religion which has been written in the hearts of their people. Chief Seattle states that "I think my people will accept it and go to the reservation you offer them", he continues explaining "we will live apart, and in peace".
Chief Seattle then goes on to conclude that the "Indian's night's will be dark", and when there are no more children of the "great tribes" left in the wide world, their spirits will still live among the earth. He warns, "the white man will never be alone...so let him [the spirits] be just and deal kindly with my people...the dead have power too.".
It is clear Chief Seattle was very well spoken and had a way of allowing his heart to be seen with his words. I feel a sense of change within myself after reading his speech.
Response to reading by Sa-go-ye-wat-ha
I truly enjoyed reading this short speech from Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha. The reading begins with a brief couple paragraphs describing the setting for the reader, which was very helpful. After reading the first few paragraphs, I was unsure where the remainder of the story was going, but I already felt a sense of frustration for the narrator.
In the second paragraph, when the bigoted Christian minister states, "all your lives have been in great errors and darkness", I instantly sensed closed mindedness from him. I realized from reading this, he was horribly judgemental and I felt anticipation to read on to find out who he was addressing.
The story continues with a beautifully written speech from a Native American man, Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha, who is responding to this Christian minister. From reading about the setting for this story, it is clear that that Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha has come to address the Christian minister and his followers in peace.
In his speech, Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha explains how the Native American people showed compassion for the white man when first arriving in America. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha explains that the white man found "friends and not enemies" when they arrived. White man had spoke about leaving their own country to escape religious persecution, and the Native American people grated their request for a "small seat" in the Native Americans land. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha spoke of giving white man corn and meat to help them establish in here in America and then receiving "poison" (rum) in return. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha also explains that his people saw the white man as friends, and white man began to call the Native American People brothers. White man began to bring more and more of their people over from Europe, and the Native Americans gave them a larger "seat". Soon white man's numbers had increased so much that they wanted all the Native Americans land. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha states, "our minds became uneasy". From there many wars took place, and many Native Americans were killed. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha describes vividly that now their own seat which once was so large, is very small. The Native American people request only enough space to "spread our blankets".
The conclusion of this reading explains how Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha extends a hand in friendship to the Christian minister which is now received, and instead the minister tells the Native Americans, he will not shake hands because "there is no fellowship between the religion of God and the devil.".
I simply was outraged when I read this! I can remember in elementary school being taught that when white man came to America, it was peaceful. I think we are preached a "sugar-coated" version of what really seems to have occurred. I don't ever recall being taught the Native American side of this story. When we are children, it's all about cartoon images of pilgrims learning from the Native American people...and never a story of the wars and brutality that we obviously created for the Native American people. We stole their land away from them, and then when they requested to be free spiritually, white people denied them of that right.
In the second paragraph, when the bigoted Christian minister states, "all your lives have been in great errors and darkness", I instantly sensed closed mindedness from him. I realized from reading this, he was horribly judgemental and I felt anticipation to read on to find out who he was addressing.
The story continues with a beautifully written speech from a Native American man, Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha, who is responding to this Christian minister. From reading about the setting for this story, it is clear that that Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha has come to address the Christian minister and his followers in peace.
In his speech, Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha explains how the Native American people showed compassion for the white man when first arriving in America. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha explains that the white man found "friends and not enemies" when they arrived. White man had spoke about leaving their own country to escape religious persecution, and the Native American people grated their request for a "small seat" in the Native Americans land. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha spoke of giving white man corn and meat to help them establish in here in America and then receiving "poison" (rum) in return. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha also explains that his people saw the white man as friends, and white man began to call the Native American People brothers. White man began to bring more and more of their people over from Europe, and the Native Americans gave them a larger "seat". Soon white man's numbers had increased so much that they wanted all the Native Americans land. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha states, "our minds became uneasy". From there many wars took place, and many Native Americans were killed. Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha describes vividly that now their own seat which once was so large, is very small. The Native American people request only enough space to "spread our blankets".
The conclusion of this reading explains how Sa-Go-Ye-Wat-Ha extends a hand in friendship to the Christian minister which is now received, and instead the minister tells the Native Americans, he will not shake hands because "there is no fellowship between the religion of God and the devil.".
I simply was outraged when I read this! I can remember in elementary school being taught that when white man came to America, it was peaceful. I think we are preached a "sugar-coated" version of what really seems to have occurred. I don't ever recall being taught the Native American side of this story. When we are children, it's all about cartoon images of pilgrims learning from the Native American people...and never a story of the wars and brutality that we obviously created for the Native American people. We stole their land away from them, and then when they requested to be free spiritually, white people denied them of that right.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
